INFORMATION MEMORANDUM
TO: Head Start Grantees and Delegate Agencies
SUBJECT: Using Child Outcomes in Program Self-Assessment
INFORMATION:
The purpose of this Memorandum is to inform Head Start grantees and delegate
agencies about:
- Steps for incorporating data on child outcomes in their program's
self-assessment.
- Recommendations for local grantee planning to implement these steps.
- Forthcoming resources on outcomes-based program self-assessment.
This Memorandum builds on the initial guidance we provided earlier this
year (ACYF-IM-00-03,
January 31, 2000) on legislative changes concerning program outcomes. These
changes include the establishment of additional results-based education
performance standards and performance measures and the requirements that
the standards and measures be adaptable for use by programs in their self-assessments
and reviewed when programs are monitored.
In our earlier guidance, we explained that the requirements for incorporating
data on child outcomes in program self-assessment apply to Head Start
services to three- to five-year children and not to children birth to
three served in Early Head Start or Migrant Head Start programs. Of course,
Early Head Start and Migrant Head Start programs are responsible for implementing
Program Performance Standards, including initial screening and ongoing
assessment of all children as well as annual program self-assessment.
Steps for Incorporating Child Outcome Data in Program Self-Assessment
Goals and Objectives
- Grantees should focus on the goal of enhancing program self-assessment
and continuous program improvement by incorporating data on child outcomes.
Programs should center planning on improving and connecting current
systems, tools, and procedures for (a) ongoing assessment of children
and (b) annual program self-assessment.
- The objectives of this initiative are to:
- Improve the content, quality, consistency and credibility of ongoing
assessment of children.
- Design an approach to analyze data on children's progress and
accomplishments.
- Incorporate child outcome data into program self-assessment and
continuous program improvement.
Improve the Content, Quality, Consistency and Credibility of
Ongoing Assessment of Children
- Attached, as Attachment A
, is the Head
Start Child Outcomes Framework. Grantees should ensure that their system
for ongoing assessment of children includes collection of some data
in each of the eight domains of children's learning and development.
The domain areas, based on the Head Start Program Performance Standards,
are:
- Language Development
- Literacy
- Mathematics
- Science
- Creative Arts
- Social & Emotional Development
- Approaches Toward Learning
- Physical Health and Development
In addition, because they are legislatively mandated, programs must
gather and analyze data on certain specific Domain Elements or Indicators
of progress in language, literacy and numeracy skills. These required
elements are shown in bold print in the Domain Elements or Indicator
columns.
Grantees may also choose to track progress in additional areas of
child, family and program outcomes, as defined in the Head Start Program
Performance Standards or based on local program goals and priorities.
They may also review other state or community initiatives on early
childhood program outcomes, so that planning addresses the implications
of these efforts for partnerships with other funding sources and agencies.
- Grantees should review their system for ongoing child assessment and
consider improvements to ensure that it provides objective, accurate,
consistent and credible information on children's progress over the
course of their participation in Head Start, including:
- Ensuring that assessment tools are appropriate for Head Start
children in terms of age-appropriateness, language and culture.
- Providing adequate oversight and supervision to ensure the quality,
accuracy, consistency and credibility of child outcome data.
- Improving initial and ongoing training for personnel who administer
assessments, record and analyze data on children's performance and
progress.
- Grantees should fully include children with identified disabilities
in the child outcome assessment system, with appropriate accommodation
of the assessment tool and process to their special needs. Programs
may elect to incorporate in their child outcomes system additional information
on the progress of children with disabilities, based on goals and measures
of progress in children's Individual Education Plans (IEP).
Design an Approach to Analyze Data on Children's Progress and
Accomplishments
- Grantees must develop a system to analyze data on child outcomes that
centers on patterns of progress for groups of children over time as
they receive services through the program year. At a minimum, data analysis
should compare progress beginning when children enter Head Start, at
a mid-point in the program year, and when they complete the program
year. Data analysis could also be designed to answer questions such
as the following:
- What are the patterns of progress and accomplishments for groups
of children in different domains and indicators of learning and
development?
- What are the patterns of outcomes for children in different program
options, forms of service, and service areas?
- What are the patterns of outcome data for different groups of
children, such as (a) those that begin Head Start at different levels
of functioning and (b) children that receive one or two years of
Head Start services?
- What are the trends in outcome data from year to year, in terms
of stability and change in patterns of progress and levels of accomplishment?
In most programs, analysis of child outcomes should be based on data
from all children enrolled. Grantees that serve very large numbers of
children may consider, with the assistance of appropriate research or
evaluation experts, approaches to analyzing outcome data from a sample
of children selected to be representative of the full population of
children served.
Incorporate Child Outcome Data in Program Self-Assessment and
Continuous Program Improvement
- Data analysis on patterns of child outcomes should be incorporated
into the overall program self-assessment system and in reporting to
agency management teams, Policy Committees and Policy Councils and governing
bodies. Data on outcomes should be considered in conjunction with overall
program self-assessment findings in planning for program improvements,
such as enhanced staff training, mentoring and supervision; improvements
in curriculum; reallocation of program resources; involvement of volunteers
and community partners; or new efforts to support families in enhancing
children's learning and development. Agencies may also consider other
opportunities to use data on child outcomes in working with community
partners, such as planning for transitions of children from Head Start
into elementary schools.
Recommendations for Program Planning
Our planned timelines for programs to include child outcome data in their
self-assessments and for monitoring these activities are explained in
Attachment B. In developing plans, grantees
are encouraged to consider the following recommendations:
- Assess implications of this new effort for management and staff responsibilities,
workload and capabilities.
- Develop and implement plans to enhance the skills and knowledge of
staff members and managers through Head Start Training & Technical
Assistance providers, consultants, higher education institutions or
research organizations.
- In conjunction with reviewing the content areas of ongoing child assessment,
carry out a similar review of program curriculum, materials, and learning
environments to ensure that they provide suitably, well-balanced and
engaging opportunities to foster children's learning and development
in each of the domain areas of the Outcomes Framework.
- Develop appropriate amendments to existing written plans for implementing
services in Early Childhood Development and Health Services, Family
and Community Partnerships, and Program Design and Management to reflect
this initiative and its connections with existing program systems.
We look forward to working with you in this important effort to improve
services for Head Start children.

Helen H. Taylor
Associate Commissioner
Head Start Bureau
TIMELINES FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND PROGRAM MONITORING
Sept. 2000 -
August 2001
Grantees begin planning, capacity-building and implementing the
inclusion of child outcome data in program self-assessment. At a minimum, each grantee should
carry out a pilot effort to analyze data on patterns of progress for a group of children, and
consider child outcome data in program self-assessment and continuous program improvement.
In addition, agencies should review and implement improvements in their ongoing child
assessment system in the areas of content, quality, consistency and credibility.
ACF develops and field-tests procedures for monitoring outcomes-based program
self-assessment in a limited set of programs.
Program Year 2001 - 2002
Grantees fully implement child outcomes-based program self-assessment
system and create baseline information on patterns of children's progress and
accomplishments during the program year.
ACF carries out first full cycle of program monitoring on grantee systems and
implementation efforts. Monitoring teams will review outcome data to
establish a baseline of expectations on patterns and forms of evidence
of children's progress and accomplishments.
Program Year 2002 - 2003
Grantees continue and improve implementation
efforts, including comparison of patterns of data on children's progress and
accomplishments from 2001-2001 and 2002-2003.
ACF conducts second full cycle of program monitoring to
examine grantee implementation
efforts and review of evidence of program effectiveness via data on
patterns of children's progress and accomplishments.