![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||||||
| Home | Services | Working with ACF | Policy/Planning | About ACF | ACF News | Search |
||||||||||||
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Home
| Publications | Partnership/Collaboration
Information Center | What's New? |

| 2005 | Issue No. 78 |
Staff can build a blueprint to help second language
learners gain confidence and skills.
by Rosa Milagros Santos and Michaelene Ostrosky
The developmental pattern for learning English is fairly consistent for all young children. This developmental pattern includes four sequential stages (Brice 2002; Tabors 1997):
Although most English language learners progress through these stages, they
move through them at different rates. The ease and the pace at which English
is learned depends on the child’s age, motivation, personality, knowledge
of the first language, and exposure to English (August & Hakuta 1997;
Brice 2002; Cummins 1991; McLaughlin 1984). Disabilities, including speech
delays evidenced in the primary language, may impact the rate of second language
acquisition (Roseberry-McKibbin 1995).
Some of the behaviors that children might demonstrate during these language-learning
stages, such as playing in isolation and not speaking in either language,
may be misinterpreted or mislabeled as a problem. In fact, children are
simply beginning to acquire the new language. These behaviors also are similar
to those exhibited by children identified with specific language or speech
impairments (Brice 2002; Rice, Sell, & Hadley 1991; Tabors 1997). Thus,
it is not uncommon for many of these children to be labeled as having challenging
behaviors or communication disorders when in fact they are following a fairly
typical developmental progression in acquiring another language.
What Behaviors Might Young English Language Learners Exhibit?
Some common behaviors associated with language acquisition that may be
misinterpreted as challenging behaviors include not talking, difficulty following
directions, difficulty expressing ideas and feelings, and responding to questions
inconsistently (Tabors 1997). For example, during the nonverbal period, staff
and parents, too, may be very worried about the child’s language
development. Roseberry-McKibbin (1995) suggests that children typically go
through the silent period for about 3-6 months, which may cause great concerns
for professionals when children do not seem to be talking. In fact, at this
stage, the child is working actively to gather information about how to communicate
with peers and adults in the new language.
During this non-verbal phase, researchers also note that children may isolate
themselves as they take on the role of spectator or observer (Brice 2002;
Tabors 1997). In “safe” environments (such as solitary play),
they may rehearse new words they have heard. Although a teacher might interpret
this tendency to keep to themselves as problematic, the English language learners
are often watching classmates and adults and attempting to figure out
how to communicate.
Additionally, Tabors (1997) notes that some children use cognitive and social
strategies in acquiring a new language that may be misinterpreted as “challenging
behaviors.” One strategy is “pretending” to understand interactions
or activities, such as large group play, when they do not grasp clearly
what is going on. In these situations, English language learners may be inconsistent
in responding to directions given by their peers or adults and, therefore,
appear to be non-compliant.
How Can I Tell if There Is Really a Behavior Problem?
Assessment is the key to pinpointing a child’s strengths and needs and
then designing instructional programs that facilitate the child’s development.
When assessing an English language learner, Head Start staff should look at
(1) the child’s abilities in terms of cognitive, social-emotional, and
physical development (referring to the eight Domains in the Child Outcomes
Framework), (2) the child’s abilities in his/her first language; and
(3) the child’s capabilities in his/her second language (Brice
2002; McLean 2002; Ortiz & Maldonado 1986).
These researchers note that because cognitive, social-emotional, and physical
development are involved in and affected by the process of second-language
acquisition, it is important to assess these areas. Knowing the child’s
abilities in his or her first language is critical in gaining a complete picture
of the child’s skills and knowledge, as is gathering information about
how a child is progressing in the development of the new language (McLean
2002). Similar to assessing children who are monolingual or speak one primary
language, conducting authentic performance-based assessment helps teachers
understand how a child uses language during day-to-day interactions
(Brice 2002; McLean 2002).
It is always important for the teaching team to work with the Head Start disabilities
coordinator, the mental health consultant, and other specialists to assess
any situation where there are concerns about a child’s development.
These personnel should be well-informed about the impact of language differences
on child behavior. For example, in Adrian’s situation, his inability
to adapt to his new classroom is due in large part to his inability to communicate
with others in that environment. Crying is his way of communicating the frustration
and anxiety that he is unable to verbalize in the new language.
What Can I Do to Support the Children in my Program?
Head Start teachers and other staff should understand the process by which
children learn language, whether it is their home language or a new language.
It is also important that they gather information from a variety of sources
and not rely on one assessment tool to ensure that they have a complete picture
of a child’s skill development. Additional sources of information include
observations of the child in different settings, interviewing adults
who provide care to the child, and collecting a sample of the child’s
work (e.g, art work, writing, etc.).
Professionals can learn from families about their children and also about
the families’ cultural, ethnic, and linguistic backgrounds. With
this knowledge and understanding of the children and their families,
staff will be better able to distinguish between a challenging behavior and
behaviors associated with the acquisition of a new language. They also will
be able to effectively support children’s overall development. The teaching
team will want to individualize instruction, because even two children from
the same cultural background might show different patterns and rates in learning
English. Thus, it is critical for Adrian’s teachers to find means to
communicate with his parents and with him to be able to support his transition
in the new classroom. Strategies such as using pictures to communicate
the classroom routines, rules, and expectations may help alleviate some of
Adrian’s anxiety about being in the classroom.
The Program Performance Standards require that programs provide
a supportive and safe environment in which children can use their home language
while learning a new language. Teachers can develop a systematic plan to promote
meaningful participation and inclusion of English language learners in routines
and activities in the classroom. They can build upon what the children know
and engage them in situations that at the beginning may not require them
to give specific responses (e.g., low-demand situations). For example,
teachers might get children more involved in group activities by having them
help carry materials such as books, name cards, and musical instruments to
circle time. The intentional use of instructional strategies -- such as pairing
new words with gestures, pictures, and cues; commenting on what a child does;
expanding and extending upon children’s words; and repeating what children
have said -- are effective in young children’s successful acquisition
of a new language.
Collaborating with families and other professionals, creating a supportive
early childhood environment, and using evi-dence-based communication strategies
are key ingredients to working effectively with English language learners.
Not only will using these strategies help in distinguishing between challenging
behaviors and behaviors associated with acquisition of a new language, but
it will also enable adults to effectively support young children’s overall
development.
This article is adapted from the What Works Brief series produced by the
Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning (www.csefel.uiuc.edu).
The What Works Brief is a continuing series of short, easy-to-read, “how
to” information packets on a variety of evidence-based practices, strategies,
and intervention procedures. The Briefs are designed to help teachers and
other caregivers support young children’s social and emotional development.
They include examples and vignettes that illustrate how practical strategies
might be used in a variety of early childhood settings and home environments.
REFERENCES
August, D. & K. Hakuta, eds. 1997. Improving schooling for language
minority children: A research agenda. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
Press.
Brice, A. E. 2002. The Hispanic child: Speech, language, culture and education.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
The Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning. 2003.
Facilitator’s Guide. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign:
Author.
Cummins, J. 1991. Interdependence for first and second language proficiency
in bilingual children. Language processing in bilingual children,
ed. E. Bialystok, 70-89. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
McLaughlin, B. 1984. Second language acquisition in childhood: Preschool
children. 2d ed. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McLean, M. 2002. Assessing young children for whom English is a second language.
Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series #4: Assessment: Gathering
meaningful information, eds. M. M. Ostrosky & E. Horn. Longmont,
CO: Sopris West.
Ortiz, A. A. & E. Maldonado-Colon. 1986. Recognizing learning disabilities
in bilingual children: How to lessen inappropriate referrals of language
minority students to special education. Journal of Reading, Writing, and
Learning Disabilities International 2 (1): 43-57.
Rice, M. L., M. A. Sell, & P.A. Hadley. 1991. Social interactions
of speech- and language-impaired children. Journal of Speech and Hearing
Research 34 (6): 1299-1307.
Roseberry-McKibbin, C. 1995. Multicultural students with special
language needs. Oceanside, CA: Academic Communication Associates.
Tabors, P. 1997. One child, two languages. A guide for preschool educators
of children learning English as a second language. Baltimore, MD: Paul.
H. Brookes Publishing Co.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children,
Youth and Families. Head Start Bureau. 2000. Celebrating cultural and
linguistic diversity in Head Start. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Rosa Milagros Santos and Michaelene Ostrosky are faculty collaborators
at the Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning at
the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. T: 217-333-0260. E: rsantos@uiuc.edu;
ostrosky@uiuc.edu online…For
more information on Head Start, visit our site at www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/hsb
| Head Start Bulletin Issue No. 78 Contents | PULL OUT: Strategies to Support Positive Child Outcomes for English Language Learners |
|
For information requests contact AskUs
We welcome your comments and suggestions, contact webmistress@headstartinfo.org For website technical assistance contact technical@headstartinfo.org To order publications contact puborder@headstartinfo.org |
Office of Head Start |
Copyright © 2002-2006 Trans-Management Systems
Corporation. All rights reserved.
Please Note: Links on this site are verified monthly.
While links are evaluated before being included on this site, HSIPC is not responsible for the information presented on external sites.